High-Level Dialogue on Connected and Automated Driving

Connected and Automated Driving (CAD) should be introduced and operated in ways that align with policy goals, for instance, increased safety, improved accessibility, enhanced equity, reduced environmental impact and accelerated economic development. CAD-based services can have implications for various dimensions of mobility, ranging from the behaviour of passengers to the structure of urban spaces. The transition must be well-managed because these changes will likely occur at different speeds.

A long-term pathway for the transition towards AV-based transport services and a clear definition about as well as coordination between each level of government in regulating CAD-based transport services are important here. But as a starting point we need to discuss where we are at, how we can approach this in a coordinated way and what priorities there are.

Pitches by

• FAME – Results and recommendations for the harmonization of testing regulations across Member States(PDF file opens in new window) (Stephane Dreher, ERTICO - ITS Europe)
• MODI - Needs, requirements, and the foreseen opportunities of automated transport for logistics(PDF file opens in new window) (Fernando Liesa, ALICE)
• NAPCORE – Recommendations on increasing interoperability, the use of data and empowering NAPs to be the backbone for ITS digital infrastructure(PDF file opens in new window) (Timo Hoffmann, bAST)

Discussion

Moderated by Filip Boelaert (MOW) and Joost Vantomme (ERTICO - ITS Europe).

While more and more pilots testing shared autonomous public transport solutions are popping up around the globe, a lot of challenges to the widespread deployment of such services remain. An efficient and well-balanced integration within the current offer, while maybe even strengthening the current offer as back-bone of mobility, new forms of licensing and demand management,… Governments will have to take on new and additional roles, for which skills and resources will be required.

How are the different countries handling this? Are good practices related to this exchanged or is there additional need to bring experts together? The sector itself is not always keen on investing in developments in that area or are facing set-backs. Where does government need to step up or in?

Pitches by

• SHOW – results on promotion and evaluation of the future transformation of the current city traffic environment and ecosystem to a fully sustainable one driven by automation, electrification, cooperativeness, and inclusiveness(PDF file opens in new window) (John McSweeney, UITP)
• ULTIMO – Unlocking large-scale and passenger-centric automated mobility(PDF file opens in new window) (Guy Fournier, Pforzheim University)

Discussion

Moderated by Filip Boelaert (MOW) and John McSweeney (UITP).

Enabling Open Road tests in a cross-border set-up and impact monitoring of CAD in real life conditions is on the agenda since the very first HLD meetings, and also has been referred to in the LoI signed by MS ministers at the Rome Digital Day (23 March 2017). However, for getting there, both the instalment of adequate (testing) ‘permission schemes’ and an amendment to ruling (national) traffic regulations are required - allowing Connected and Automated Vehicles to hit the public road. Despite continuous work over the years this remains challenging in most European countries - whereas such tests and related data collection are pivotal for closely interlinked system development, type-approval related activities and realistic impact monitoring.

Sessions planned under ‘stream 1’ will provide insight on the themes and their inter-relation, the challenges and progress so far in light of European-wide coordinated and even harmonized approaches (morning session), followed by additional in-depth (expert-) discussions to finetune outcomes of related ongoing task force(s) and FAME-workshops (afternoon break-out sessions).

14:55- 16:05: Testing permits (in collaboration with the EU-funded FAME project)

• Introduction / recapitulation morning session(PDF file opens in new window) (Carlos Lujan, Idiada)
• Pre-homologation permits(PDF file opens in new window) (Tobias Reich, Rich Autonomy GmbH/ on behalf of DG GROW) ​
• Recommendations for a EU framework for testing on public roads(PDF file opens in new window) (FAME) (Carlos Lujan, Idiada)
• Interactive discussion (moderated by experts)
• Conclusions and the way forward (Carlos Lujan, Pablo Rodriguez & Stephane Dreher)

16:35 – 17:45: Traffic regulations & Type Approval

• Introduction(PDF file opens in new window) (Carlos Lujan, Idiada)
• The German Regulatory framework & provisions in place(PDF file opens in new window) (Martin Sonntag, Min. Digital & Transport)​
• Testimonies from MS
• EU 2022/1426 & interpretation document & transition to larger series(PDF file opens in new window) (Cristina Galassi, DG GROW)
• The US/ Technology companies perspective (Marc Van Impe, Tesla)
• Q&A and wrap-up

While more and more pilots testing shared autonomous public transport solutions are popping up around the globe, a lot of challenges to the widespread deployment of such services remain. An efficient and well-balanced integration within the current offer, while maybe even strengthening the current offer as back-bone of mobility, new forms of licensing and demand management,… Governments will have to take on new and additional roles, for which skills and resources will be required. How are the different countries handling this? Are good practices related to this exchanged or is there additional need to bring experts together? The sector itself is not always keen on investing in developments in that area or are facing set-backs. Where does government need to step up or in?